PRP Hair Treatment

PRP is indeed a popular regenerative treatment; it involves drawing a small sample of blood from the patient, which is then spun down in the centrifuge to separate out platelet-rich plasma. Once the PRP has been prepared, it is injected into the scalp at the level of hair follicles with the primary intention of rescuing dormant hair follicles.

hair transplant cost
Experience Doctors
0 + Years
Successful Procedures
0 L +
Cities In India
0 +
Clinics
0 +

Free Consultation

Free Cab Facility

No-Cost EMI

Support in Insurance Claim

1-day Hospitalization

Key Advantages of PRP Treatment

PRP improves the inherent healing mechanisms of a given person. It generates an environment for hair follicular regeneration and for improved hair growth.

  1. The method does not employ surgical cuts, therefore allowing a quick return to normalcy with very minimal pain.
  2.  PRP can be combined with other therapies for even greater efficacy, thus permitting its use for a wide array of hair loss conditions.
  3. Since the treatment uses the patient’s blood, the chance of any such reactions is very minimal, rendering the entire experience very safe.

What is GFC Hair Treatment?

The  advantages  proffered  by a  GFC Treatment

  • GFC hair treatment envelopes the growth factors in a much higher concentration than PRP, which may in turn facilitate more intense hair regrowth.
  • The GFC hair treatment approach targets follicles, giving them a blood supply and freight of nutrients so that the hair may enter the growth phase.
  • Concentrated injections of growth factors may create a healthier hair environment through decreased inflammation and the balancing of sebum production.
  • In several instances, most patients may achieve considerable results in few treatment sessions as compared with PRP.

Comparison of Benefits: PRP vs GFC

Comparing PRP and GFC hair treatment, one must look at several factors such as growth factor types, effective session numbers, and practical effectiveness.

Benefits of PRP Treatment

  • Activates hair follicles to promote the growth of new hair strands.
  • When conducted, this treatment applies to men suffering from androgenetic alopecia and may be used by women patients struggling with hair loss.
  • No need for surgical cuts makes this a safer option for many patients.
  • Most of PRP treatment is adjunct with other drugs or therapies for supplementing treatment results.
  •  

Benefits of GFC Therapy

Who will be ideal candidates for PRP and GFC benefits?

Both PRP and GFC hair treatments have much to offer for people who experience hair loss, but each treatment is intended for a certain type of patient condition and medical history.

PRP Candidate Criteria

Typically, a person with an excellent density of hair follicles responds well to PRP therapy. Certain conditions might prevent someone from being the best candidate, such as:
  • Any active infection in the scalp that may halt treatment.
  • The effect of PRP might be reduced in individuals with autoimmune diseases.
  • A condition that manifests low platelets would result in reduced efficiency.
  • Patients with such chronic liver and skin diseases can interfere with the generation of and effectiveness of growth factors in the body.
  • Blood Disorders with Coagulopathy: PRP is not meant for a person having a condition that causes improper coagulation.

Reason for GFC Candidate

GFC hair treatment for hair loss has been well tolerated by the majority since the treatment is mainly focused on extracting and concentrating the growth factors and discarding other blood cell components. It is, therefore, recommended in cases where:

  • GFC is effective for men and women alike.
  • Patients with scalp inflammation or sebum production regulation imbalance may respond better.
  • There exist alopecia patients who will benefit from the concentrated growth factors that promote hair growth.
  • Proper consultations addressing issues relating to either PRP or GFC must be appropriately availed to a hair restoration physician to determine if one or both treatments may be the best for any specific case.
  • Session, Maintenance, and Expected Results
  • The duration and frequency of treatment sessions differ based on each case and severity of the hair loss condition. 

.

Beau Monde's Free Post-Operative Care

Free Consultation

Free Cab Facility

No-Cost EMI

Support in Insurance Claim

PRP Treatment

  1. Multiple: Results are visible by the third session.
  2.  Interval: Sessions last five to six weeks apart.
  3.  Maintenance: Follow-up sessions are necessary to maintain results.

GFC Treatment

  • Fewer sessions: A higher concentration of growth factors may render GFC effective for more visible results within a few sessions.
  • Fast results: Several studies reported good results; around 83% of patients achieved desired results faster.
  • Duration: Just as long as PRP depending on the patient`s age, level of hair loss, and general health.

Which treatment is better?

Choosing which treatment option stands superior: PRP versus GFC is simply no easy task. They have some advantages over each other, and hence the best will completely depend on the needs and condition of the individual. Here are some last considerations:

1.PRP Hair Treatment: This method is famous for being quite effective in stimulating hair follicles naturally with the use of the patient’s blood plasma. It is regarded as a minimally invasive procedure with little risk of adverse reactions. 

2.GFC Hair Treatment: GFC promises speed and visible results, as the preparation contains a much higher concentration of growth factors. It intrigues patients who feel that PRP has worked only a little for them or intend to receive maximum improvement in the least number of sessions. 

Which Medical Treatment Is Better?

Difficult to choose which is better between PRP and GFC. Both have their own advantages over one another and the one best used would be dependent on an individual’s need and condition. Here are a few points to consider in the end:

PRP Hair Treatment

This modality is known for its natural stimulation of hair follicles using the patient’s plasma. It is minimally invasive, low risk of adverse reactions, with commonly all patients taking it as a first line of treatment by those men and women who are experiencing early hair loss. Affordability and success established over time have made this a popular option among dermatologists.

GFC Hair Treatment

GFC hair treatment has a higher concentration of growth factors hence it might deliver faster, more vigorous results. The treatment is appealing to those who have had meager results with PRP. It’s excellent for those seeking-scale results in fewer sessions. Such an advancement in GFC hair treatment definitely makes it worth spending more to gain a benefit for the patients concerning more stimulation of the hair follicle with good health of the scalp.

Cost: PRPs Vs. GFC

The cost of the treatment typically is the defining factor for most patients on what they would prefer to choose between PRP and GFC treatments. The cost of PRP and GFC hair treatment would also vary according to this and other factors. As a rule of thumb, the costs for these procedures usually range from INR 4000 to INR 10000 for a session.

Cost efficiency is one of the key advantages of PRP as compared to GFC hair treatment. The procedure of plasma extraction and concentration is a well-formed and widely situated technique that has, then, helped in reducing the costs of PRP.

The GFC treatment is mostly higher priced since it requires a rather complex methods to collect those high concentrations of growth factors. Still, most patients found this bit to understand because quite fast and dramatic change is promising.

Conclusion

PRP and GFC hair treatment  revolutionized the conception of non-surgical hair restoration. It offers hope towards numerous individuals that are struggling with hair loss cases. PRP has minimal invasiveness with natural regenerative capabilities, making it the most accepted treatment across the globe for those thinning hair. GFC hair treatment, on the other hand, presents a promising faster and more pronounced effect with the higher concentration of growth factors and efficacy within fewer sessions.

Simply put, there is no answer as to whether either therapy is better or not. There are valid reasons for both treatments, and the right option depends on a combination of medical advice, patient-specific factors, and individual goals. Staying informed and working with a professional takes you on the right road to achieving your hair restoration goals and the natural, full hair you desire.

Medically Reviewed By

Dr. Ashutosh Misra
25Years Experience Overall

Last Updated : March 15, 2025

Our Patient Love Us

Based on 185 Recommendations | Rated 4 Out of 5

Our Patient Love Us